MCCAMBRIDGE v. BURWELL
OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 12/22/16. 12/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER S. McCAMBRIDGE,
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL,
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1148
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, after considering (1) the motion for
summary judgment filed by the pro se plaintiff and any responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 16, 27); (2)
the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant and any responses thereto (Doc. Nos.
17, 29); (3) the statement of undisputed material facts in support of the defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (Doc. No. 18); (4) the plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. No. 20); and (5) the
plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 30); and after reviewing the
administrative record filed by the Defendant (Doc. No. 14); and for the reasons set forth in the
separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED;
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED;
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, Sylvia Matthews Burwell,
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and against the plaintiff, Peter S. McCambridge;
The plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED;
The plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED; and
The clerk of the court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?