WILLIAMS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al

Filing 18

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOCS. 1 AND 6) ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFIATE OF APPEALABILITY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 7/9/18. 7/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA YA QUAN GERALD WILLIAMS, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, v. NO. 16-1299 THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, et al., FIL-D JUL , 0 20\8 ,,,·-· '1-\RKMAN Clerk • Oep. Clark ~ Kc It.. • Respondents. c., - - ORDER AND NOW, this 1 !!,.- of July, 2018 , upon careful and independent consideration day of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 6), Respondent District Attorney of Lancaster County's Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 13), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. 14), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docs. 1 and 6) are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: &LA~~ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?