PERSONCARE OF READING, INC. v. LENGEL et al

Filing 16

OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 10) IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 6) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 2) WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/17/17. 3/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PERSONACARE OF READING, INC., d/b/a
KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND
REHABILITATION - WYOMISSING,

CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff,

NO. 16-1965

v.
KATHRYN M. LENGEL and THERESA A.
QUITINSKY, and as co-Executrixes of the Estate
of MARY KATHRYN QUITINSKY,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2017, upon review of Plaintiff’s
Motion to Compel Arbitration, Defendants’ Motion to Strike Motion to Compel
Arbitration (Docket No. 6) and Plaintiff’s response thereto, as well as Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto, and after oral
argument being heard, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is DENIED;
2. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket
No. 6) is DENIED; and
3. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
Arbitration (Docket No. 2) within twenty (20) days.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.