ALLWEIN et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES et al
Filing
26
OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY BINDING ARBITRATION, ECF NO. 19, IS DENIED; DEFENDANT IUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL 21'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 21, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THIS CASE IS STAYED PENDING ARBITRATION. THE PARTIES ARE TO NOTIFY THIS COURT NO LATER THAN TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE ARBITRATION HAS CONCLUDED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/28/17. 9/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
CHRIS ALLWEIN et al.,
Plaintiffs,
:
:
:
v.
:
:
PPG INDUSTRIES;
:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND :
ALLIED TRADES, AFL-CIO, DISTRICT
:
COUNCIL 21;
:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED
:
TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN; and
:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED
:
TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN,
:
Defendants.
:
__________________________________________
No. 5:16-cv-02049
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion
to Stay Binding Arbitration, ECF No. 19, and Defendant IUPAT District Council 21’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Binding Arbitration, ECF No. 19, is DENIED;
2. Defendant IUPAT District Council 21’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
a. Defendant IUPAT District Council 21’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
DENIED;
b. Defendant IUPAT District Council 21’s request, in the alternative, to stay this
action pending arbitration is GRANTED;
3. This case is STAYED pending arbitration;
4. The parties are to notify this Court no later than twenty days after the arbitration has
concluded.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge
1
092817
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?