RODENBAUGH v. SANTIAGO et al
OPINION/ORDER THAT BOANDL'S ADDENDUM TO HER MOTION TO DISMISS, WHICH RE-RAISED THE ARGUMENTS SET FORTH IN HER MOTION TO DISMISS AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, BOANDL, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, DAPHNE RODENBAUGH; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/14/17. 2/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUDGE SANTIAGO, JASON
ADDUDDELL, TRACY BONDALL, and
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2158
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2017, after considering the motion to dismiss
filed by the defendant, Tracy Bondall (hereinafter referred to as “Boandl”), which the court
converted into a motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 22); and after considering Boandl’s
addendum to her motion, which re-raised the arguments set forth in her motion to dismiss as a
motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28); and for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed
memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
Boandl’s addendum to her motion to dismiss, which re-raised the arguments set
forth in her motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED;
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, Boandl, and against the plaintiff,
Daphne Rodenbaugh; and
The clerk of the court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?