BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. et al v. IREX CONTRACTING GROUP et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO QUASH A SUBPOENA, THE RESPONSE AND ROBER RUSSO'S LETER IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 11/3/17. 11/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES, INC., et al.
IREX CORPORATION, et al.
AND NOW, this 3rd
day of November, 2017, upon consideration of
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash a Subpoena (Doc. 235), the response (Doc. 240), and Robert
Russo’s letter (Doc. 243), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART. Within ten days of the date of this Order, Mr. Russo
shall produce a copy of the settlement agreement redacted to show only the names and
signatures of the parties, dates of agreement, and any provision that includes any promise
of pecuniary value made to Mr. Russo, including money, job offer, or indemnification.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ELIZABETH T. HEY
ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S.M.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?