BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. et al v. IREX CONTRACTING GROUP et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO BRAND'S FIFTH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 2/7/2018. 2/9/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES, INC., et al.
IREX CORPORATION, et al.
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’
Motion to Compel Documents Responsive to Brand’s Fifth Request for Production of
Documents, the response, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
1. With respect to Requests 1 and 2, if Defendants have any documents
evidencing its assertion that none of the identified servers was commissioned or
decommissioned during the relevant time period, they will produce such documents. If
they do not, they shall confirm that there are no responsive documents. Defendants shall
also either amend their prior response that none of the listed servers was commissioned or
decommissioned during the specified time frame or provide a verified confirmation of
2. With respect to Request 6, defense counsel shall confirm that Defendants have
searched the servers that could contain responsive documents and, if unable to so
confirm, shall search the appropriate servers for responsive documents.
In all other respects, the Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ELIZABETH T. HEY
ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S.M.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?