E.D. v. SHARKEY et al
Filing
57
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF THE DEFENDANT, JEREMIAH PETREY (DOC. NO. 36) IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF THE DEFENDANT, THOMAS DECKER (DOC. NO. 44) IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 5/16/17. 5/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
E.D.,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2750
v.
DANIEL SHARKEY, BERKS COUNTY
RESIDENTIAL CENTER-IMMIGRATION
FAMILY CENTER (BCRC-IFC),
COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA,
THOMAS DECKER, ICE Field Office
Director, DIANE EDWARDS, Director of
BCRC-IFC, JEREMIAH I JOSH PETREY,
ICE Employee; JOHN BEHM, JAMIE
HIMMELBERGER, BRITTANY
ROTHERMEL, ERIKA TAYLOR, and
MATTHEW MALINOWSKI,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2017, after considering the allegations in the second
amended complaint (Doc. No. 31), the separately-filed motions to dismiss of the defendants,
Jeremiah Petr�y and Thomas Decker (Doc. Nos. 36,
44), the plaintiffs responses to the motions
(Doc. Nos. 38, 53), and the defendants' replies (Doc. Nos. 39, 55); accordingly, and for the
reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as
follows:
1.
The motion to dismiss of the defendant, Jeremiah Petrey (Doc. No. 36), is
GRANTED. Count II against Petrey is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Count V
against Petrey is
2.
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
The motion to dismiss of the defendant, Thomas Decker (Doc. No.
44), is
GRANTED. Counts II, III, and V against Decker are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3.
The plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to file a
third amended complaint.
BY THE COURT:
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?