CADET v. THE OWNERS OF BERKS COUNTY JAIL et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS LEINBACH, BARNHARDT, SCOTT AND GRAFFUS, AND CADET'S CLAIMS AGAINST THESE FOUR DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANS QUIGLEY, SMITH AND TORRES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/15/17. 2/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JERRY ANTHONY CADET,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-02829

v.
THE OWNERS OR BERKS COUNTY JAIL,
et al.
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion
to dismiss (ECF No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part in accordance with the following:
1. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Leinbach, Barnhardt, Scott and
Graffius, and Cadet’s claims against these four Defendants are DISMISSED with
prejudice;
2. The motion is DENIED with respect to Defendants Quigley, Smith and Torres.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

10