ELLINGSWORTH v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al
Filing
21
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/22/17. 3/23/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARYKATE ELLINGSWORTH
Plaintiff,
v.
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-3187
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 12),
Defendant’s Reply Brief in Further Support of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15), and
Plaintiff’s Sur Reply in Furtherance of Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 19),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?