ELLINGSWORTH v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/22/17. 3/23/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARYKATE ELLINGSWORTH Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3187 ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 12), Defendant’s Reply Brief in Further Support of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15), and Plaintiff’s Sur Reply in Furtherance of Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 19), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?