HARRISON v. HEALTH NETWORK LABORATORIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al

Filing 33

OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT'S ORDER OF JANUARY 9, 2017 (DOC. 17) IS VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. 12) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REMAND THIS MATTER TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 3) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/21/17. 3/21/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KAREN HARRISON
v.
HEALTH NETWORK LABORATORIES
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and
LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK,
INC.

: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 16-3530
:
:
:
:

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
motion for reconsideration and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion
[Doc. 19] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the Court’s Order of January 9, 2017 [Doc. 17] is
VACATED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to remand [Doc. 12] is
GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to remand this matter to
the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County.
It is further ORDERED that the defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. 3] is
DENIED without prejudice to renewing the motion in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh
County.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.