ANDREW v. BUSKIRK et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR DEFENDANTS TODD BUSKIRK, FRANK LONGENBACH AND ROBIN STANLEY AGAINST FRANK E. ANDREW ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMPLAINT. CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/14/17. 8/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANK E. ANDREW,
TODD BUSKIRK, et al.,
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion for
Summary Judgment by defendants Todd Buskirk, Frank Longenbach, and Robin Stanley
(Docket No. 27), and all responses thereto; the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by
plaintiff Frank E. Andrew (Docket No. 25), and all responses thereto; and having heard
the arguments of counsel at a hearing before me on July 10, 2017, it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the
plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for defendants Todd Buskirk, Frank Longenbach,
and Robin Stanley against Frank E. Andrew on the entirety of the Complaint.
This case is CLOSED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C. J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?