BROBST, JR. et al v. CROSSETT, ESQ. et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. 20 AND 21) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/31/17. 6/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM F. BROBST, JR., et al,
DAVID W. CROSSETT, ESQ., et al.,
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by
Defendants David W. Crossett, Esq., Smith Law Group, LLC, and James M. Smith, Esq. (Docket
No. 20), the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant William F. Brobst, Sr. (Docket No. 21), the
Plaintiffs’ Responses in Opposition (Docket Nos. 23 and 24), the Notice by Defendants David
W. Crossett, Esq., Smith Law Group, LLC, and James M. Smith, Esq. (Docket No. 33), and the
Notice by the Plaintiffs (Docket No. 34), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss
(Docket Nos. 20 and 21) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. As to all defendants, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED with respect to counts
four, five, six, seven, eight, ten, and twelve and those counts are DISMISSED
2. The motions to dismiss are DENIED with respect to counts one, two, three, nine,
eleven, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?