ARTESANIAS HACIENDA REAL S.A. de C.V. v. NORTH MILL CAPITAL, LLC et al
Filing
168
ORDER OF 12/1/22 THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE SEPARATELY FILED MEMORANDUM OPINION; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: THE DEFENDANT HELLER'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 166) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE (DOC. 165) IS STRICKEN AND ANY REQUESTED RELIEF WITHIN IT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH ON 12/1/22. 12/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
Case 5:16-cv-04197-EGS Document 168 Filed 12/01/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ARTESANIAS HACIENDA REAL
S.A. de C.V.,
Plaintiff,
v.
NORTH MILL CAPITAL LLC and
LEISAWITZ HELLER,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4197
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2022, after considering both the plaintiff’s notice
that no opposition has been timely filed to its motion in limine to offer and rely on the prior
deposition testimony of non-party witness Jim Lightburn and related exhibits thereto and so
requesting entry of proposed order (Doc. No. 165) and defendant Leisawitz Heller’s motion to
strike plaintiff’s notice (Doc. No. 166); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed
memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The defendant Leisawitz Heller’s motion to strike (Doc No. 166) is GRANTED;
2.
The plaintiff’s notice (Doc. No. 165) is STRICKEN and any requested relief
and
within it is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?