APONTE v. FERGUSON et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 11) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS ACTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/9/17. 8/10/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TAMMY S. FERGUSON, et al.,,
Civ. No. 16-4761
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of
Geovanni Aponte’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of Judge Sitarski (Doc. No. 11) to which there are no objections, it is hereby
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
The Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.
A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue because Petitioner has not made
a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this action.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?