WEAVER v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filing 10

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ALLOW PETITIONER TO EXHAUST HIS STATE COURT REMEDIES BEFORE RETURN TO FEDERAL COURT; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 4/5/17. 4/5/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LOVELLE KINON WEAVER, Petitioner, v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4811 ORDER AND NOW, this _5th___ day of April, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Respondents’ Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 5), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Doc. 7), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to allow Petitioner to exhaust his state court remedies before returning to federal court; and 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker _________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?