ULEAREY v. PA SERVICES, INC. et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT ONE. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT THREE. THAT CLAIM IS DISMISSED. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PARAGRAPH 13 FROM THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 4/6/17. 4/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GRACE ULEAREY, Plaintiff, v. PA SERVICES, INC. d/b/a STONG PLUMBING and STEVE REED, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4871 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Motion for a More Definite Statement, and Motion to Strike (Docket No. 5) and the plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to count one. 2. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to count three. That claim is DISMISSED. 3. The defendants’ motion for a more definite statement is DENIED. 4. The defendants’ motion to strike Paragraph 13 from the Complaint is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?