ACOSTA v. MCMAHON

Filing 5

ORDER THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 11/9/16. 11/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, MAILED TO UNREP.(er, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAMONA ACOSTA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACK MCMAHON,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5131

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2016, the court having issued an order on
October 25, 2016, requiring the pro se plaintiff, Ramona Acosta, to show cause why the court
should not dismiss this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 2); and the court
having considered the plaintiff’s written response, which unfortunately does not address the issue
of subject-matter jurisdiction; and for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum
opinion; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

2.

The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.