MELENDEZ-BONILLA v. MCGINLEY et al
ORDER MELENDEZ-BONILLA'S OBJECTIONS, ECF NO. 17, TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 9, IS ADOPTED IN PART AS STATED IN THE OPINION. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED A ND DISMISSED AS FOLLOWS: A. CLAIMS ONE THROUGH SEVEN ARE DISMISSED AS PROCEDURALLY DEFAULTED. B. CLAIMS EIGHT THROUGH ELEVEN ARE DENIED ON THEIR MERITS. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/10/18. 4/11/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED.(er, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS MCGINLEY, SUPERINTENDENT, :
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE
COUNTY OF BERKS, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued
this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Melendez-Bonilla’s objections, ECF No. 17, to the Report and Recommendation
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, is ADOPTED in part as stated in
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED as follows:
Claims One through Seven are dismissed as procedurally defaulted;
Claims Eight through Eleven are denied on their merits;
This case is CLOSED; and
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?