MCKINLEY v. INVENT HELP

Filing 7

ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. THE DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF REFILING HIS STATE LAW CLAIMS IN STATE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 1/20/17. 1/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN VASHA UN MCKINLEY CIVIL ACTION v. INVENT HELP NO. 16-6503 ORDER AND NOW, this ;;e ?I/ day of January, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiffs amended complaint (ECF No. 5) it is ORDERED that: 1. The amended complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to plaintiff refiling his state law claims in state court. 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: GERALD A. MCHUGH, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?