MCKINLEY v. INVENT HELP
ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. THE DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF REFILING HIS STATE LAW CLAIMS IN STATE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 1/20/17. 1/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN VASHA UN MCKINLEY
AND NOW, this
day of January, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiffs amended
complaint (ECF No. 5) it is ORDERED that:
The amended complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The dismissal is without prejudice to plaintiff refiling his state law claims in state court.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
GERALD A. MCHUGH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?