THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH Q. MIRARCHIH LEGAL SERVICES, P.C. et al v. THORPE et al

Filing 38

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 16, 18, AND 20) ARE GRANTED, AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DALE THORPE, RENEE THORPE, ROGER ASHODIAN, BB&T CORPORATION, LITITZ PROPERTIES, LLC, AND JOHN FIORILLO ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND DEFENDANT FIORILLO'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 24 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/29/17. 8/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH Q.
MIRARCHI LEGAL SERVICES, P.C., and
SILVER LEGAL SERVICES, P.C.,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION

v.

NO. 16-6604

DALE THORPE, RENEE THORPE h/w,
HERBERT MCDUFFY, JR., ROGER
ASHODIAN, BB&T CORPORATION,
LITITIZ PROPERTIES, LLC, and JOHN
FIORILLO,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants BB&T
Corporation and Lititz Properties, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16); Plaintiffs’ Response
in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 30); Defendants’ Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 31);
Defendants Roger Ashodian, Dale Thorpe, and Renee Thorpe’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.
18); Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 28); Defendant John Fiorillo’s Motion
to Dismiss (ECF No. 20); Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 29); Defendant
John Fiorillo’s Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 24); and Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition
thereto (ECF No. 27); after oral argument and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s
Memorandum Opinion of August 29, 2017 (ECF No. 37), IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 16, 18, and 20) are GRANTED, and all
claims against Defendants Dale Thorpe, Renee Thorpe, Roger Ashodian, BB&T
Corporation, Lititz Properties, LLC, and John Fiorillo are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE; and
(2) Defendant Fiorillo’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 24) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.