STURZENACKER v. CMC RESTORATION, INC. et al
ORDER THAT THIS COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER COUNTS II, III, IV, V, AND VI PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1367(C)(2). COUNTS II, III, IV, V, AND VI ARE SEVERED FROM THE COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO AN ACTION TO BE FILED IN STATE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 7/27/17. 8/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(mas, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GLORIA STURZENACKER ,
CMC RESTORATION, INC.;
CHRISTOPHER & BRUMMETT, INC; and
AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued
this date above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
This Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Counts II, III, IV,
V, and VI pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2).
Counts II, III, IV, V, and VI are SEVERED from the Complaint, 1 and
DISMISSED without prejudice to an action to be filed in state court. 2
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.___________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 (“The court may also sever any claim against a party.”).
“The period of limitations for any claim asserted under subsection (a) . . . shall be tolled
while the claim is pending and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law
provides for a longer tolling period.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?