DRUCKENMILLER v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 11/28/2017. 11/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Brief
and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9, filed June 12,
2017), the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated November 2, 2017, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendations (Document No. 15, filed November 16, 2017), and
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Document No. 17, filed November 28, 2017), IT IS ORDERED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J.
Rueter dated November 2, 2017, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations are
OVERRULED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation which has been
approved and adopted by the Court;
Plaintiff’s Request for Review is DENIED; and,
The Clerk of Court shall MARK this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?