WEISER et al v. ELIZABETHTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

Filing 26

OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 9) IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CROSSCLAIM (DOC. NO. 10) IS DENIED AS MOOT; AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSSCLAIM (DOC. NO. 19) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/27/18. 2/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LIZA WEISER and SCOTT WEISER, as
administrators and personal representatives of the
ESTATE OF DAVID WEISER and in their
individual capacities,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-625

Plaintiffs,
v.
ELIZABETHTOWN AREA SCHOOL
DISTRICT, MICHELE BALLIET, MONICA
STEWARD, GEORGE LONGRIDGE, NATHAN
FRANK, MICHELLE HECKMAN, MARY
ROUSH, and JOHN/JANE DOE # 1-10 SCHOOL
DISTRICT EMPLOYEES/OFFICIALS,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim, and Motion to Dismiss Amended
Crossclaim, as well as the opposition thereto and all replies, and after oral argument
being held, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is DENIED;
2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim (Docket No. 10) is
DENIED as moot;
3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Crossclaim (Docket No. 19)
is DENIED; and

4. Defendants shall file an answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint
within twenty (20) days.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

2