WILLIAMS v. MADENSPACHER et al
Filing
9
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 8/7/17. 8/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN WILLIAMS,
v.
JOSEPH C. MADENSPACHER, et al.,
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-0691
ORDER
AND NOW, this _7th_____ day of August, 2017, upon careful and independent
consideration of the revised Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3), the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. 6), and Petitioner’s
objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
DECREED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The Petition for Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
_____________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?