WILLIAMS v. MADENSPACHER et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 8/7/17. 8/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN WILLIAMS, v. JOSEPH C. MADENSPACHER, et al., : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0691 ORDER AND NOW, this _7th_____ day of August, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the revised Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. 6), and Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker _____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?