CATERBONE v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
Filing
6
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND THE OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/28/17. 3/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, or
NSA; DEFENSE ADVANCED
RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY, or
DARPA; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE;
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or
DIA; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, or CIA; FEDERAL BUREAU
OF INVESTIGATION, or FBI; UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL; PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE; PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL; LANCASTER COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS; LANCASTER
COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION;
LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT; LANCASTER MAYOR
RICK GRAY; LANCASTER CITY
BUREAU OF POLICE; DETECTIVE
CLARK BEARINGER, LANCASTER
CITY BUREAU OF POLICE,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-867
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017, after considering the complaint and amended
complaint filed by the pro se plaintiff, Stanley J. Caterbone, on behalf of himself and Advanced
Media Group (Doc. Nos. 1-1 – 1-6; 1-10 – 1-17), Caterbone’s “notice of appeal,” which the court
has interpreted as a motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Carlson’s January 9, 2017
report and recommendation (Doc. No. 1-25); and after also considering Caterbone’s (1) “Motion
to File Exhibit DVD” (Doc. No. 2), (2) “Motion to File Statement ‘Enough is Enough,’” which
also contained a request for permission to file documents electronically (Doc. No. 3), and (3)
“Motion to File Exhibit Titled ‘Letter to Huntingdon Bank Andrew Grimmit re March 7
Liquidation Offer March 17, 2017’” (Doc. No. 4); and for the reasons set forth in the separatelyfiled memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE except as
otherwise specified in the court’s memorandum opinion and in this order;
2.
To the extent that the plaintiffs sought preliminary injunctive relief, the request is
DENIED AS MOOT in light of the court’s dismissal of the amended complaint;
3.
Caterbone’s claims based on the March 8, 2016 incident that took place in
Maryland, as described further in the court’s memorandum opinion, are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Caterbone filing a complaint against appropriate defendants in the
District of Maryland. Caterbone may not file an amended pleading in this court based on those
claims;
4.
Caterbone’s claims based on the events surrounding his involuntary commitment
in July 2015 and February 2016, as described further in the court’s memorandum opinion, are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Caterbone filing a second amended complaint
within thirty (30) days of the date of this order as to those claims only. Any amended complaint
shall identify all defendants in the caption of the pleading. Additionally, any amended complaint
shall, as clearly and briefly as possible, state the factual basis for Caterbone’s claims against each
defendant, state the basis for the court’s jurisdiction over the claims, and state the relief that
Caterbone seeks from this court. If Caterbone fails to file a second amended complaint within
2
the thirty (30)-day period set forth above, the court may dismiss this case without any further
notice to him;
5.
The “notice of appeal,” which the court has interpreted as a motion for
reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Carlson’s January 9, 2017 report and recommendation (Doc.
No. 1-25), is DENIED;
6.
The “Motion to File Exhibit DVD” (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED;
7.
The “Motion to File Statement ‘Enough is Enough,’” which also contained a
request for permission to file documents electronically (Doc. No. 3), is DENIED; and
8.
The “Motion to File Exhibit Titled ‘Letter to Huntingdon Bank Andrew Grimmit
re March 7 Liquidation Offer March 17, 2017’” (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?