AUSTIN v. FERGUSON et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 1/10/18. 1/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION SHAUN PATRICK AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. NO. ,..,-- - . \' -. ' •, 17-cv-981 --.1-~\ ~ SUPERINTENDENT FERGUSON, et al., Respondents. . ' . r. ~~O<\ ! -~ ..,& ·1• • L : .,) ORDER This 1oth day of January, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Petitioner's objections, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, J. ENT'D JAN 1 0 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?