AUSTIN v. FERGUSON et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 1/10/18. 1/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHAUN PATRICK AUSTIN,
,..,-- - .
SUPERINTENDENT FERGUSON, et al.,
. ' . r. ~~O<\
..,& ·1• • L : .,)
This 1oth day of January, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the
petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254, and after review of the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and
Petitioner's objections, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, J.
ENT'D JAN 1 0 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?