YORK v. MOONEY et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 4) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/10/17. 10/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MEDFORD EUGENE YORK, JR.,
OCT Ii 2017
SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY, et al., Mr:: 0
'- Ui~i- .KMAN, Clerk
AND NOW, this 10th day of October 2017, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ
of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge David R. Strawbridge (Doc. No. 4), and that the Report and Recommendation has not
been objected to by the parties, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis
contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and
adopted by this Court, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right and reasonable jurists would not debate the correctness of this ruling.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
OCT 11 2017
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?