SCHAEFFER v. BERRYHILL

Filing 17

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/25/18. 6/25/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANGELA SCHAEFFER,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-2846

v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2018, upon careful consideration of the
Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra
Moore Wells recommending remand for further consideration (ECF No. 15), and given
that neither Schaeffer nor the Commissioner has objected to the report, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;1
2. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED, and the matter is
REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to
the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with
the Report and Recommendation;
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff; and,

When no objection is made to a Report and Recommendation, the Court should, as a matter
of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept
the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Oldrati v. Apfel, 33 F.
Supp. 2d 397, 399 (E.D. Pa. 1998). No clear error appears on the face of the record and the Court
accordingly accepts Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells’ Recommendation.
1

4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

2