SIGUENZA v. CITY OF READING et al

Filing 39

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 32, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS SET FORTH IN COUNT V, COUNT VI, COUNT VII, COUNT VIII, COUNT IX, AND COUNTS IX ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THIS COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPP LEMENTAL OVER THE REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMAND THIS MATTER TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, JULY TERM, 2017, DOCKET NO. 17-14708. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/9/18. 1/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, CERTIFIED COPY TO PROTHONOTARY OF BERKS, E-MAILED.(er, ) Modified on 1/10/2018 (er, ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
SERJIO ENRIQUE SIGUENZA,
Plaintiff,

:
:
:
v.
:
:
CITY OF READING; WILLIAM M. HEIM;
:
JESUS SANTIAGO; ERIC KOLLER;
:
SANDHU AND SONS, INC.;
:
MCLANE COMPANY, INC.;
:
MCLANE FOOD SERVICE, INC.;
:
MCLANE GROCERY, INC.; SUNOCO, LP,
:
Defendants.
:
___________________________________________

No. 5:17-cv-03482

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this
date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 32, is GRANTED.

2.

Plaintiff’s claims set forth in Count V, Count VI, Count VII, Count VIII, Count IX,

and Counts IX 1 are DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.

This Court declines to exercise supplemental over the remaining state law claims.

4.

The Clerk of Court shall REMAND this matter to the Court of Common Pleas of

Berks County, Pennsylvania, July Term, 2017, Docket No. 17-14708.
5.

The Clerk of Court shall send a certified copy of this Order to the Prothonotary of

the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania.
6.

This case is CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._____________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge

1

Plaintiff’s Complaint has two counts labeled as “IX”, both of which are dismissed.
1
010918