COOPER-BOOTH TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, L.P. v. DAIMLER TRUCKS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 12 13 MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS TWO AND THREE OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND DENIED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO COUNT ONE OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. COUNT TWO OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES, IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT THREE OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/23/18. 4/25/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ COOPER-BOOTH TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, L.P., : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : DAIMLER TRUCKS OF : NORTH AMERICA, LLC, and : DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, : : Defendants. : __________________________________________ No. 5:17-cv-3884 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Detroit Diesel Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 12, Defendant Daimler Trucks of North America, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13, Plaintiff’s Responses in Opposition, ECF Nos. 16-17, Defendants’ Reply Briefs in Support, ECF Nos. 18-19, and Plaintiff’s Sur-Replies in Opposition, ECF Nos. 23-24, and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART with respect to Counts Two and Three of Plaintiff’s Complaint and DENIED IN PART with respect to Count One of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2. Count Two of Plaintiff’s Complaint, for breach of implied warranties, is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Count Three of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, for breach of contract, is DISMISSED without prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 042318

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?