HERRERA v. CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE REQUEST TO PROCEED PRO SE' IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE A PERIOD OF TWENTY-ONE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/25/17. 10/26/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE
DEPARTMENT and MOTOR VEHICLE
FROM THE STATE OF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4287
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2017, after considering the application to proceed
in forma pauperis and proposed complaint filed by the pro se plaintiff, Lorraine Herrera (Doc.
No. 1); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
The application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED and the
plaintiff has leave to proceed in forma pauperis;
The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
The request to proceed pro se (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT because the
plaintiff does not need permission to proceed pro se; and
The plaintiff shall have a period of twenty-one (21) days from the date of this
order to file an amended complaint. If the plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, the
court will dismiss her claims with prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?