ESHLEMAN v. PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.

Filing 14

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (3), IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ESHLEMAN WILL BE GIVEN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTING FORTH ADDITIONAL FACTS, IF AVAILABLE, TO SUBSTANTIATE THE PERCEIVED NON-TRANSITORY NATURE OF HIS IMPAIRMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/29/18. 7/2/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM ESHLEMAN Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4427 PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC. Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2018, upon reviewing Defendant Patrick Industries, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 3), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Patrick Industries’ motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff William Eshleman will be given twenty-one (21) days to amend the Complaint for the purpose of setting forth additional facts, if available, to substantiate the perceived non-transitory nature of his impairment. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?