KUNSMAN v. METROPOLITAN DIRECT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 21

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT METLIFE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 10 ) IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. PLAINTIFF KUNSMAN'S BAD FAITH CLAIM (COUNT II) WILL REMAIN. PARAGRAPHS 31, 33, AND 34 SHALL BE STRICKEN FROM PLAINTIFF KUNSMANS AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/21/18. 6/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTER."\; DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROL KUNSMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-4619

METRO POLITAN DIRECT PROPERTY A~D
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

FILED
JUN 2 1 2018

Defendant.
_,....

!!-

AND NOW,

KATE BARKMAN, Cterk
By
Dep.Clerk

ORDER

thi~ day of June, 2018, upon reviewing Defendant Metropolitan Direct

Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("MetLife") Motion to Dismiss (Docket

~o.

10), all

supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum
opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant MetLife's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. I 0) is DENIED in part and

GRANTED in part.

2. Plaintiff Kunsman's Bad Faith claim (Count II) will remain.
3. Paragraphs 31, 33, and 34 shall be stricken from Plaintiff Kunsman's Amended
Complaint.

BY THE COURT: