CARDIOLOGY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC. v. RAVI

Filing 8

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 3 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IS PART AS FOLLOWS: A. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO ONE THEORY OF LIABILITY IN THE BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM AND COUNT ONE OF THE COMPLAINT MAY PROCEED. B. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE REGARDING THE REQUEST TO DISMISS OR STRIKE THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION IN THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. C. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO THE PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL CLAIM AND COUNT TWO IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. D. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO THE UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM AND COUNT THREE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/18/18. 4/19/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ CARDIOLOGY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC., Plaintiff, : : : v. : : PRASAD RAVI, M.D., : Defendant. : __________________________________________ No. 5:17-cv-04743 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 3, is GRANTED in part and DENIED is part as follows: A. The Motion is denied with respect to one theory of liability in the breach of contract claim and Count One of the Complaint may proceed. B. The Motion is denied without prejudice regarding the request to dismiss or strike the liquidated damages provision in the Employment Agreement. C. The Motion is granted as to the promissory estoppel claim and Count Two is DISMISSED with prejudice. D. The Motion is granted as to the unjust enrichment claim and Count Three is DISMISSED with prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 1 041818

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?