RUDOLF-GREENE v. BERRYHILL

Filing 19

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART DATED 8/28/18 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART DATED 8/28/18. ALL OF THE ISSUES RAISED IN PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS WERE ADDRESSED IN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WHICH THIS COURT HAS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/23/18. 10/26/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAMMY RUDOLF-GREENE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. NO. 18-106 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Request for Review, the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart dated August 28, 2018, Plaintiff’s Objections to Report & Recommendation, and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart dated August 28, 2018, is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Objections to Report & Recommendation are OVERRULED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart dated August 28, 2018. All of the issues raised in Plaintiff’s Objections were addressed in the Report and Recommendation which this Court has approved and adopted; 3. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is DENIED; and, 4. The Clerk of Court shall MARK this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?