HARMER v. CAPOZZA et al

Filing 48

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT JUDGE RICE'S 7/12/2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 40 ) IS APPROVED IN PART. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND FIRST AND SECOND SUP PLEMENTAL PETITIONS ARE DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS ISSUED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 8/29/2019. 8/29/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN M. HARMER v. CIVIL ACTION N0.18-175 MARK CAPOZZA, et al. ORDER AND NOW, this 29 th day of August 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's first supplemental habeas Petition (ECF Doc. No. 5), Petitioner's second supplemental habeas Petition (ECF Doc. No. 9), Response (ECF Doc. No. 15), Petitioner's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 16), United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice's July 12, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 40), Petitioner's Objections (ECF Doc. No. 43), Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 45), Petitioner's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 46), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Judge Rice's July 12, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 40) is APPROVED in part; 2. We overrule Petitioner's Objections (ECF Doc. No. 43) in part and grant the Objections in part but find the granted Objections do not warrant granting the Petition; 3. We DENY and DISMISS the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) and first and second supplemental Petitions (ECF Doc. Nos. 5, 9) with prejudice; 4. We issue a certificate of appealability as to Petitioner's claim of his trial counsel's inherent conflict automatically requiring a finding of ineffective assistance under the Sixth Amendment based on an undisclosed successive representation of a co-defendant in the same criminal case; 1 and, 5. 1 The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2),(3). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?