LANCASTER COUNTY INVESTORS COMPANY et al v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. et al
Filing
29
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND AND ATTORNEY FEESIS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THIS ACTION IS REMAND TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. &1447 (c). THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 1/28/19. 1/28/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, COPY TO MD.(jl, )
IN THE UNITEI) STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LANCASTER COUNTY
INVESTORS COMPANY et al,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
N0.18-1609
COMMUNITY HEAL TH
SYSTEMS, INC. et al,
Defendants.
V
ORDER
'1" \\
AND NOW, this
.d§.... day of January 2019, upon consideration of
Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand and Attorney Fees (ECF Nos. 11 & 14),
Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand (ECF No.
20), Community Health Systems, Inc.'s Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion
for Remand (ECF No. 21), Plaintiffs' Reply (ECF No. 22), and in accordance with
the Court's accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED
that Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand and Attorney Fees (ECF Nos. 11 & 14) is
GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. It is ORDERED that this action
is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The clerk shall close
this case.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?