MUHAMMAD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF EDUCATION et al

Filing 16

ORDER OF 4/20/2019 THAT THE MOVANT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 11, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION ECF NO. 14, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVITS OF SERVICE , ECF NO. 8, ARE QUASHED; PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO PROPERLY SERVE ALL DEFENDANTS AND FILE VALID PROOF OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT NO LATER THAN MAY 15, 2019; AND PLAINTIFF IS ADVISED HIS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER AND THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF HIS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/10/2019. 4/10/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(DT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MAURICE MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; SIEGFRIED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTHAMPTON PA; RENEA SALITT, (School Administrator) Principal; 1 CYNTHIA CORA HOCH SNYDER, (School Admin 2nd Gr Teacher); 2 JOSEPH S. KOVALCHIK, (Super Intendant); SCHOOL COUNSELORS; BLAKE LAST NAME UNKNOWN, (Student); and PARENTS OF BLAKE STUDENT, (Unknown), Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 5:18-cv-02647 ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Renee Sallit, Cynthia Hoch, Cora Snyder, Joseph S. Kovalchik, and the unidentified School Counselors (“Movant Defendants”), ECF No. 11; the Court’s Order dated November 20, 2018, ECF No. 13, which directs Plaintiff to respond to the Movant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss no later than Wednesday, December 5, 2018; the Court’s Order dated November 8, 2018, ECF No. 12, which directs Plaintiff to properly serve Siegfried Elementary School and the Pennsylvania Department of Education and file proof of service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 for those entities within thirty days of the date of that Order; Plaintiff’s Motion, ECF 1 2 The correct spelling of this Defendant’s name is Renee Sallit. The correct spelling of these two Defendants’ names are Cynthia Hoch and Cora Snyder. 1 041019 No. 14, which request additional time to complete service and appointment of counsel, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Movant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part without prejudice; 3 3. Plaintiff’s Affidavits of Service, ECF No. 8, are QUASHED; 4. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to properly serve all Defendants and file valid proof of service with the Court no later than May 15, 2019; and 5. Plaintiff is advised his failure to comply with this Order and the accompanying Opinion may result in the dismissal of his complaint with prejudice without further notice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 3 Any renewed motion requesting appointment of counsel should indicate what additional evidence (1) satisfies the threshold question of whether the case has some arguable merit in fact and law and (2) demonstrates that the Tabron factors weigh in favor of appointment of counsel. 2 041019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?