ISMAIL v. DS SMITH PLC et al

Filing 49

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS (DOC. 40 ) ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 36 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE JOINT REQUEST TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT BY COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT IS GRANTED. THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ATTACHED TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS CONFIRMED AND DEEMED FULLY ENFORCEABLE IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/19/19. 12/20/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HESHAM ISMAIL v. DS SMITH HOLDINGS, INC., et al. : CIVIL ACTION : : NO. 18-2881 : : ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Plaintiff’s Objections, and after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendant is granted. 4. The Settlement Agreement attached to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is confirmed and deemed fully enforceable in its entirety. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?