ISMAIL v. DS SMITH PLC et al
Filing
49
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS (DOC. 40 ) ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 36 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE JOINT REQUEST TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT BY COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT IS GRANTED. THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ATTACHED TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS CONFIRMED AND DEEMED FULLY ENFORCEABLE IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/19/19. 12/20/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HESHAM ISMAIL
v.
DS SMITH HOLDINGS, INC., et al.
: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 18-2881
:
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon careful and independent
consideration of the Plaintiff’s Objections, and after de novo review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and
Defendant is granted.
4. The Settlement Agreement attached to the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation is confirmed and deemed fully enforceable in its
entirety.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?