ISMAIL v. DS SMITH PLC et al

Filing 51

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS (DOC. 40 ) ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 36 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE JOINT REQUEST TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT BY COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT IS GRANTED. THE ORAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMEN T RECORDED IN OPEN COURT ON APRIL 3, 2019 (DOC. 45 )IS CONFIRMED AND DEEMED FULLY ENFORCEABLE IN ITS ENTIRETY. PLAINTIFFS MOST RECENT REQUEST TO RESTORE THIS CASE TO THE DOCKET OF THE UNDERSIGNED IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/6/20. 1/6/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HESHAM ISMAIL
v.
DS SMITH HOLDINGS, INC., et al.

: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 18-2881
:
:

AMENDED ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2020, this Court’s previous Order of
December 19, 2019 [Doc. 49] is AMENDED as follows: upon careful and independent
consideration of the Plaintiff’s Objections, argument held in open Court on November
22, 2019 and following a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and

ADOPTED.
3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and
Defendant is granted.
4. The oral settlement agreement recorded in open court on April 3, 2019
[Doc. 45] is confirmed and deemed fully enforceable in its entirety.
5. Plaintiff’s most recent request to restore this case to the docket of the
undersigned is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.