VALENZUELA v. ROSELLE

Filing 18

ORDER OF 4/28/21 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 6), PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, AND THE DEFENDANTS' REPLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER THE COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN MAY 12, 2021. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 4/28/21. 4/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ JULIANA VALENZUELA, As the Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Santos, deceased and as the Personal Representative of his wrongful death beneficiaries, Plaintiff, : : : : : : v. : : OFFICER JONATHAN R. ROSELLE, : Individually and in his official capacity as a : member of the South Whitehall Township Police : Department, et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________ Civil No. 5:20-cv-03638-JMG ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, upon consideration of Defendants Officer Jonathan R. Roselle and South Whitehall Township’s partial motion to dismiss and motion to strike (ECF No. 6), Plaintiff Juliana Valenzuela’s response in opposition (ECF No. 9), and the defendants’ reply (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. The defendants shall answer the complaint no later than May 12, 2021. BY THE COURT: /s/ John M. Gallagher JOHN M. GALLAGHER United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?