VALENZUELA v. ROSELLE
Filing
18
ORDER OF 4/28/21 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 6), PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, AND THE DEFENDANTS' REPLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER THE COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN MAY 12, 2021. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 4/28/21. 4/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
JULIANA VALENZUELA,
As the Administratrix of the Estate of
Joseph Santos, deceased and as the Personal
Representative of his wrongful death beneficiaries,
Plaintiff,
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
:
:
OFFICER JONATHAN R. ROSELLE,
:
Individually and in his official capacity as a
:
member of the South Whitehall Township Police :
Department, et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
__________________________________________
Civil No. 5:20-cv-03638-JMG
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, upon consideration of Defendants Officer
Jonathan R. Roselle and South Whitehall Township’s partial motion to dismiss and motion to
strike (ECF No. 6), Plaintiff Juliana Valenzuela’s response in opposition (ECF No. 9), and the
defendants’ reply (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion (ECF No.
6) is DENIED. The defendants shall answer the complaint no later than May 12, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John M. Gallagher
JOHN M. GALLAGHER
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?