BROWN V. SAUL
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND MATTER IS REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 USC 405(g) AS OUTLINED HEREIN. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT. CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/17/21. 11/17/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
Case 5:20-cv-05391-RAL Document 23 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Commissioner of Social Security,1
AND NOW this 17th day of November, 2021, upon consideration of the parties’
submissions, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED, and the matter is
REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to
the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with
the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order;
2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed
contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993);
Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including
_s/ Richard A. Lloret ________
HON. RICHARD A. LLORET
United States Magistrate Judge
Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule
25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Ms. Kijakazi should be substituted for the former
Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, as the defendant in this action. No further action need be
taken to continue this suit pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Social
Security disability actions “survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of
Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?