Gardner v. KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 80

ORDER THAT 1. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT [DOC. 43] IS GRANTED. 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY ON COUNTS I, II, III, IV, V AND THE PART OF COUNT VI ASSERTING A CLAIM FOR INTERFERENCE. 3. THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 63] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/27/24. 3/27/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLYN GARDNER
v.
KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY, et al.

: CIVIL ACTION
:
: NO. 22-1034
:
:

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2024, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Doc. 43] is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Plaintiff and against Defendant Kutztown
University on Counts I, II, III, IV, V and the part of Count VI asserting a claim for
interference.
3. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 63] is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part.
4. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts VII, VIII, XI and XII and the part of Count VI
asserting a claim for retaliation.
5. The motion is DENIED as to all other Counts.
6. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Kutztown University and against the
Plaintiff on the part of Count VI asserting a claim for retaliation.
7. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Kenneth Hawkinson and against Plaintiff
on Counts VII and VIII of the Complaint.
8. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Jesus Pena and against Plaintiff on Count
XI of the Complaint.

1

9. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Jennifer Weidman and against Plaintiff on
Count XII of the Complaint. 1

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

1

There are no Counts IX or X listed in the Complaint.

2