Scott v. Lackey, et al

Filing 432

ORDER denying Wellington's motion req'ng protective order & that Scott be req'd to provide final exhibit list 423 , overruling Wellington's objections to Scott's trial exhibits 411 , denying Scott's motion to determine sufficiency of Wellington's answers to pltf's RFAs 419 & directing that all other pending motions, objs, & corrs pending before the ct will be resolved @ trial. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 07/03/12. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERESA ANNE SCOTT, Plaintiff v. PAMELA WELLINGTON Defendant : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:02-CV-01586 (Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of defendant Pamela Wellington’s motion requesting a protective order preventing plaintiff Teresa Scott (“Scott”) from deposing witnesses that are unavailable for trial and requesting an order requiring Scott to provide a final exhibit list (Doc. 424), filed June 25, 2012, and Wellington’s objections to Scott’s trial exhibits (Doc. 411), filed June 18, 2012, and Scott’s motion to determine the sufficiency of Wellington’s answers to plaintiff’s requests for admissions (Doc. 419), filed June 22, 2012, and all other motions, objections, and correspondence pending before the court, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Wellington’s motion requesting a protective order and requesting that Scott be required to provide a final exhibit list (Doc. 423) is DENIED. 2. Wellington’s objections to Scott’s trial exhibits (Doc. 411) is OVERRULED. 3. Scott’s motion to determine the sufficiency of Wellington’s answers to plaintiff’s requests for admissions (Doc. 419) is DENIED. 4. All other pending motions, objections, and correspondence pending before the court will be resolved at trial. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?