Chmiel v. Beard et al

Filing 158

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 157 ) - IT IS ORDERED THAT Petitioners motion (Doc. No. 146) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146-3) as the oper ative petition in this matter.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall comply with the following deadlines:1. Petitioner shall file a Memorandum of Law and updated, comprehensive appendix on or before December 29, 2022; SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/30/22. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID CHMIEL, Petitioner v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Respondents : : : : : : : No. 1:06-cv-02098 (Judge Kane) THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE ORDER AND NOW, on this 30th day of September 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146) and Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 147), the Response thereto (Doc. No. 152), and Petitioner’s Reply (Doc. No. 156), and in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 146) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146-3) as the operative petition in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall comply with the following deadlines: 1. Petitioner shall file a Memorandum of Law and updated, comprehensive appendix on or before December 29, 2022; 2. Respondents shall file an Answer/Response to the Amended Petition and Memorandum of Law within sixty (60) days of service of Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law and updated appendix; and 3. Petitioner may file a Reply within twenty-one (21) days of service of Respondents’ Answer/Response and Memorandum of Law. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?