Chmiel v. Beard et al
Filing
158
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 157 ) - IT IS ORDERED THAT Petitioners motion (Doc. No. 146) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146-3) as the oper ative petition in this matter.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall comply with the following deadlines:1. Petitioner shall file a Memorandum of Law and updated, comprehensive appendix on or before December 29, 2022; SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/30/22. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID CHMIEL,
Petitioner
v.
JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.,
Respondents
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:06-cv-02098
(Judge Kane)
THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 30th day of September 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner’s
Motion to Amend Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146) and Memorandum of Law
(Doc. No. 147), the Response thereto (Doc. No. 152), and Petitioner’s Reply (Doc. No. 156), and
in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED
THAT Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 146) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to
docket the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 146-3) as the operative
petition in this matter.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall comply with the following
deadlines:
1. Petitioner shall file a Memorandum of Law and updated, comprehensive appendix on or
before December 29, 2022;
2. Respondents shall file an Answer/Response to the Amended Petition and Memorandum
of Law within sixty (60) days of service of Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law and
updated appendix; and
3. Petitioner may file a Reply within twenty-one (21) days of service of Respondents’
Answer/Response and Memorandum of Law.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?