Mincy v. Klem et al

Filing 50

ORDER deeming pltf's motion to compel 47 as unopposed & GRANTING same & directing defts to respond to pltf's interrogatories by 12/1/10 & shall file certificate of compliance w/ the court. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/17/10. (ki)

Download PDF
Mincy v. Klem et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HILTON KARRIEM MINCY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD KLEM, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0790 (Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's unopposed1 motion to compel (Doc. 47) answers to interrogatories, and it appearing that plaintiff served requests for interrogatories on defendants on or about July 12, 2010, and received no response (Doc. 49, at 1), and it further appearing that on August 25, 2010, plaintiff sent a letter to counsel for defendants requesting that counsel comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing discovery (Id. at 2), but received no response, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 47) is DEEMED unopposed and GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's interrogatories on or before December 1, 2010, and shall file a certificate of compliance with the court. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge 2. Defendants failed to file a brief in opposition to plaintiff's motion. It is therefore deemed unopposed. See L.R. 7.6 (stating that any party who fails to oppose a motion within fourteen days shall be deemed not to oppose the motion). 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?