Melendez v. Planned Parenthood of Central Pennsylvania
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the action be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(b).Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2008; Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser on 9/9/08. (Attachments: # 1 NOTICE)(rc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NANCY MELENDEZ, Plaintiff v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:07-CV-1491 (Judge Conner) (Magistrate Judge Smyser)
NOTICE Any party may obtain a review of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 72.3 of the Rules of Court, M.D.Pa., which provides:
Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings, recommendations or report addressing a motion or matter described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) or making a recommendation for the disposition of a prisoner case or a habeas corpus petition within ten (10) days after being served with a copy thereof. Such party shall file with the clerk of court, and serve on the magistrate judge and all parties, written objections which shall specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings, recommendations or report to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. The briefing requirements set forth in Local Rule 72.2 shall apply. A judge shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge, however, need conduct a new hearing only in his or her discretion or where required by law, and may consider the record developed before the magistrate judge, making his or her own determination on the basis of that record. The judge may also receive further evidence, recall witnesses or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?