Ozoroski v. Beard et al

Filing 67

ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's 3rd amended complaint 65 is STRICKEN - Pltf may refile a 3rd amended complaint that comports w/ the memo & order of ct 63 dated 2/18/09. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/16/09. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY N. OZOROSKI, Plaintiff v. DR. FREDERICK R. MAUE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2009, upon consideration of plaintiff's third amended complaint (Doc. 65), permissively filed pursuant to the memorandum and order of court (Doc. 63) dated February 18, 2009, and it appearing that Jeffrey A. Beard ("Beard") was dismissed as a defendant in the above-captioned matter, (see id. at 7 n.9), and that the official capacity claims were dismissed with prejudice against defendants Dr. Frederick R. Maue ("Maue") and Marva Cerullo ("Cerullo"), (id. at 11-12; order 2(a)), but that plaintiff's third amended complaint re-alleges claims against Beard, (see Doc. 65), as well as official capacity claims against both Maue and Cerullo, (see id.), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's third amended complaint (Doc. 65) is STRICKEN. Plaintiff shall be permitted to re-file a third amended complaint that comports with the memorandum and order of court (Doc. 63) dated February 18, 2009. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?