SHIENVOLD v. HERSHEY COMPANY, THE et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (re: multiple motions to dismiss: It is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The motions to dismiss 471, 473 & 474 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) by Mars Canada, Nestle SA & Nestle Canada are GRANTED; 2) Motion to dismiss 466 pursuant to Rule 12(b )(2) by Cadbury plc & Cadbury Holdings DENIED; 3. Motion to dismiss 469 amended complaints of indirect end users & indirect purchasers for resale pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) DENIED in part & DENIED as MOOT in part as follows... (see Paras 3a & 3b for s pecifics); 4) Motion to dismiss 476 amended complaints of direct purchasers & individual pltfs pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) DENIED in part & DENIED as MOOT in part as follows... (see Paras 4a & 4b for specifics); 5) Motion to dismiss 464 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Cadbury plc & Cadbury Holdings DENIED. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/11/09. (jc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?